prmpt.onl

Un sito per i prompt AI

Framework Decisioni Business

Fonte: Capitolo 6 - Settore Business & Strategy
Categoria: Domini Specialistici
Livello: Avanzato
URL: prmpt.onl/205

Quando usarlo

Per decisioni business critiche che richiedono framework strutturato e analisi multi-dimensionale. Il template che trasforma decisioni complesse in processi rigorosi con outcome predicibili.

Ideale per:

Template

ANALISI DECISIONI STRATEGICHE

DECISIONE DA VALUTARE: [descrivi la decisione]

Applica ragionamento sistematico:

FASE 1: ANALISI SITUAZIONE
- Valutazione stato attuale
- Identificazione stakeholder chiave
- Definizione criteri di successo
- Timeline e vincoli di risorse

FASE 2: GENERAZIONE OPZIONI
- Brainstorm di tutte le alternative valide
- Includi "non fare nulla" come baseline
- Considera approcci ibridi
- Identifica soluzioni creative

FASE 3: MATRICE DI VALUTAZIONE
Per ogni opzione, valuta:
- Impatto finanziario (ricavi, costi, ROI)
- Allineamento strategico con la visione aziendale
- FattibilitĂ  di implementazione
- Fattori di rischio e mitigazione
- ProbabilitĂ  di accettazione stakeholder

FASE 4: FORMAZIONE RACCOMANDAZIONE
- Pesare i criteri per prioritĂ  business
- Valutare ogni opzione oggettivamente
- Identificare vincitore chiaro e seconda scelta
- Documentare il razionale approfonditamente

FASE 5: AMPLIFICAZIONE QUALITĂ€
Trasforma l'analisi in presentazione esecutiva convincente:
- Riepilogo esecutivo (decisione chiave + razionale)
- Evidenze supportate dai dati
- Roadmap di implementazione
- Metriche di successo e piano di monitoraggio

Mostra il ragionamento completo, poi fornisci raccomandazione esecutiva rifinita.

Varianti

Per Technology Investment Decisions

Aggiungi: “Include technical feasibility deep dive, integration complexity assessment, vendor evaluation matrix, e technology lifecycle considerations.”

Per Market Entry Decisions

Aggiungi: “Focus su market size validation, competitive landscape analysis, regulatory requirements, e go-to-market strategy feasibility.”

Per Organizational Change Decisions

Aggiungi: “Include change management complexity, team impact assessment, cultural alignment evaluation, e communication planning requirements.”

Esempio di workflow

Input: “Should we acquire a 20-person AI startup for €3M to accelerate our ML capabilities?”

AI Response (Decision Analysis):

BUSINESS DECISION ANALYSIS: AI STARTUP ACQUISITION

## DECISION CONTEXT CLARIFICATION
**DECISION STATEMENT:** Acquire StartupX (20 employees, ML/AI focus) for €3M to accelerate our AI capabilities vs internal development vs partnership alternatives.

**CRITICAL INFO NEEDED:**
- Current ML capabilities in-house vs startup's unique IP
- Timeline pressure: quando ci servono AI capabilities?
- Integration complexity: culture fit e technical stack alignment?
- Competition: altri interessati all'acquisition?

## OPTION GENERATION & ANALYSIS

### OPTION A: ACQUIRE STARTUP (€3M)
**FINANCIAL IMPACT:**
- Upfront cost: €3M + integration costs (~€500K)
- Ongoing costs: Team retention (~€2.5M/year)
- Avoided R&D: ~€1.5M internal development saved
- Revenue acceleration: Estimated +€5M ARR potential in 18 months

**STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT:**
- PRO: Immediate AI capabilities, proven team, market credibility
- CONTRO: Distraction from core business, cultural integration risks
- MARKET TIMING: AI competitive pressure increasing rapidly

**OPERATIONAL FEASIBILITY:**
- INTEGRATION: 6-9 months per full integration
- RETENTION RISK: Key talent may leave (startup → corporate)
- CAPABILITY GAP: Still need AI infrastructure e data pipelines

**RISK ASSESSMENT:**
- PROBABILITY SUCCESS: 70% (based on team quality e IP value)
- DOWNSIDE: €3.5M sunk cost, talent flight, distraction
- MITIGATION: Earn-out structure, retention bonuses, clear integration plan

### OPTION B: INTERNAL DEVELOPMENT (€1.5M)
**FINANCIAL IMPACT:**
- Development cost: €1.5M over 12 months
- Hiring costs: €200K recruitment + €2M/year team costs
- TIME COST: 18-24 months vs 6 months acquisition

**STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT:**
- PRO: Full control, aligned culture, proprietary development
- CONTRO: Slow time-to-market, hiring challenges, learning curve

**RISK ASSESSMENT:**
- PROBABILITY SUCCESS: 50% (hiring talent difficulty, market timing)
- DOWNSIDE: Competitive disadvantage, longer payback period

### OPTION C: PARTNERSHIP/LICENSING (€500K-1M)
**FINANCIAL IMPACT:**
- Lower upfront investment
- Revenue sharing ongoing
- Faster implementation

**STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT:**
- PRO: Low risk, faster time-to-market
- CONTRO: Less control, dependency, limited differentiation

## DECISION RECOMMENDATION

**WEIGHTED SCORING ANALYSIS:**
- Financial Impact (30%): A=8, B=6, C=7
- Strategic Fit (25%): A=9, B=7, C=5  
- Feasibility (25%): A=7, B=5, C=9
- Risk Level (20%): A=6, B=4, C=8

**TOTAL SCORES:** A=7.4, B=5.5, C=7.2

**RECOMMENDATION: OPTION A - ACQUIRE (with conditions)**

**RATIONALE:**
- Highest strategic value e fastest time-to-market
- AI competitive window chiudendo rapidamente
- Talent acquisition piĂą difficile oggi che 12 mesi fa
- €3M reasonable per proven team e IP

**CRITICAL SUCCESS CONDITIONS:**
1. **DUE DILIGENCE VALIDATION:**
   - IP audit + freedom to operate analysis
   - Team retention commitment (18+ months)
   - Technology stack compatibility assessment
   - Customer/revenue validation

2. **STRUCTURED DEAL TERMS:**
   - €2M upfront + €1M earn-out over 18 months
   - Key employee retention bonuses
   - Clear milestone e integration success metrics
   - Exit clauses se integration fails

3. **INTEGRATION PLAN:**
   - Dedicated integration manager
   - 100-day integration roadmap
   - Cultural integration workshops
   - Clear reporting structure e autonomy balance

**SUCCESS METRICS (18-month horizon):**
- Team retention: >80% key employees
- Revenue impact: +€3M ARR attributed to AI features
- Integration completion: Full technical e operational integration
- Customer adoption: >40% customers using AI features

**DECISION REVIEW POINTS:**
- Month 3: Integration progress e team retention assessment
- Month 6: Early revenue impact measurement
- Month 12: Full ROI e strategic value evaluation

**COMMUNICATION STRATEGY:**
- Internal: AI acceleration strategic rationale
- External: Expanded AI capabilities announcement
- Team: Integration support e career development focus

Tips per risultati migliori

  1. Criteria weighting: Assign explicit weights ai decision criteria basati su business priorities attuali
  2. Quantification dove possibile: Transform qualitative factors into measurable proxies per comparison
  3. Scenario planning: Consider multiple scenarios (optimistic, realistic, pessimistic) per robust decision
  4. Implementation readiness: Include implementation complexity e change management nell’evaluation

Template correlati


📖 Da “Prompt Engineering: Il Nuovo Skill” di Marco Milani
đź”— Tutti i template: prmpt.onl/index
📱 Accesso rapido: [QR Code]