Template: Analisi Documento Sistemica
Fonte: Appendice A - Analisi e Comprensione
Categoria: Utility Templates
Livello: Intermedio
URL: prmpt.onl/a02
Quando usarlo
Quando devi analizzare documenti complessi (contratti, report, research, proposal) per estrarre insights chiave, identificare risk/opportunity, e produrre executive summary actionable.
Ideale per:
- Contract review e legal document analysis
- Competitor research e market intelligence
- Business proposal evaluation
- Academic research e literature review
Template
# ANALISI DOCUMENTO: [Nome/Tipo Documento]
Agisci come Expert Document Analyst specializzato in [SETTORE/TIPO DOCUMENTO].
## 📄 DOCUMENTO CONTEXT
**Tipo**: [Contract/Report/Proposal/Research/Other]
**Fonte**: [Autore, organizzazione, data]
**Lunghezza**: [Pagine/words count approssimativo]
**Scopo Analysis**: [Perché sto analizzando questo documento]
**Decision Context**: [Che decisione supporta questa analysis]
---
## 🎯 ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK
### LEVEL 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXTRACTION
Fornisci sintesi esecutiva (max 200 parole) che include:
- **Main Purpose**: Obiettivo primario del documento
- **Key Findings**: 3-5 punti più importanti
- **Critical Decisions**: Decisioni o raccomandazioni principali
- **Stakeholder Impact**: Chi è impattato e come
### LEVEL 2: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Analizza organization e flow:
- **Document Structure**: Come è organizzato (sezioni, logica)
- **Argument Flow**: Come vengono presentati gli argomenti
- **Evidence Quality**: Solidità di data/sources/references
- **Missing Elements**: Cosa manca o è inadequately addressed
### LEVEL 3: CONTENT DEEP DIVE
Per ogni sezione significativa, identifica:
- **Core Claims**: Cosa viene affermato
- **Supporting Evidence**: Come viene supportato
- **Assumptions**: Assunzioni sottostanti (stated/unstated)
- **Implications**: Conseguenze se claims sono true/false
### LEVEL 4: CRITICAL EVALUATION
Valuta criticamente:
- **Strengths**: Aspetti convincenti e ben documentati
- **Weaknesses**: Gaps, logical flaws, insufficiente evidence
- **Bias/Perspective**: Potential bias dell'autore o organizzazione
- **Credibility Assessment**: Affidabilità complessiva
### LEVEL 5: ACTIONABLE INSIGHTS
Genera insights business-relevant:
- **Opportunities**: Cosa possiamo leverage positivamente
- **Risks**: Red flags o potential negative impacts
- **Questions**: Domande critiche da investigare further
- **Recommendations**: Next steps concreti basati su analysis
---
## 🔍 SPECIALIZED ANALYSIS (Seleziona appropriato)
### A. FINANCIAL/BUSINESS DOCUMENTS
- **Financial Impact**: Revenue, costs, ROI implications
- **Market Assumptions**: Market size, growth, competitive assumptions
- **Risk Factors**: Financial, operational, market risks identified
- **Timeline**: Critical dates, milestones, dependencies
### B. LEGAL/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
- **Key Terms**: Critical clauses e obligations
- **Risk Exposure**: Liability, penalties, compliance issues
- **Rights & Obligations**: What each party must/can do
- **Termination/Exit**: How agreement can end, consequences
### C. RESEARCH/TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS
- **Methodology**: Research approach validity
- **Data Quality**: Sample size, bias, reliability
- **Conclusions**: How well supported by evidence
- **Applications**: Practical implications for our context
### D. COMPETITIVE/MARKET DOCUMENTS
- **Competitive Position**: How we compare
- **Market Trends**: Direction industry is heading
- **Strategic Implications**: What this means for our strategy
- **Response Options**: How we might respond
---
## 📊 OUTPUT SPECIFICATIONS
### EXECUTIVE BRIEF (1 page)
DOCUMENT: [Title e source] PURPOSE: [Why analyzed] KEY TAKEAWAY: [Most important insight]
CRITICAL FINDINGS:
- [Finding 1 with implications]
- [Finding 2 with implications]
- [Finding 3 with implications]
ACTION REQUIRED: [What needs to happen next] TIMELINE: [Any critical dates/deadlines] STAKEHOLDERS TO INFORM: [Who needs to know]
### DETAILED ANALYSIS REPORT
- **Section-by-section breakdown** con key points
- **Risk/Opportunity matrix** con probability/impact
- **Question inventory** per further investigation
- **Reference/Source verification** se applicable
### COMPARISON FRAMEWORK (se multiple documents)
| Criterion | Doc A | Doc B | Doc C | Recommendation |
|-----------|-------|-------|-------|----------------|
| [Comparison point] | [Assessment] | [Assessment] | [Assessment] | [Which is better/why] |
---
## ⚠️ ANALYSIS QUALITY CHECKLIST
### Completeness Check
- [ ] All major sections addressed
- [ ] Key claims identified e evaluated
- [ ] Supporting evidence assessed
- [ ] Implications clearly articulated
### Objectivity Check
- [ ] Personal bias acknowledged e minimized
- [ ] Multiple perspectives considered
- [ ] Assumptions made explicit
- [ ] Limitations of analysis noted
### Actionability Check
- [ ] Clear next steps identified
- [ ] Recommendations specific e measurable
- [ ] Timeline for actions provided
- [ ] Resource requirements estimated
---
## 🎯 CONTEXT-SPECIFIC FOCUS
**Per Contract Analysis**: Focus su terms, obligations, risks, exit clauses
**Per Research Analysis**: Focus su methodology, findings validity, applications
**Per Competitive Analysis**: Focus su strategic implications, response options
**Per Financial Analysis**: Focus su numbers, assumptions, scenarios, ROI
Prioritize analysis elements basati su [SPECIFIC DECISION/CONTEXT].
Varianti
Per Legal Document Review
Aggiungi: “Include clause-by-clause analysis, compliance requirements assessment, liability evaluation, e contract negotiation recommendations.”
Per Academic Research Analysis
Aggiungi: “Include methodology critique, statistical validity assessment, literature gap analysis, e research replication considerations.”
Per Market Research Evaluation
Aggiungi: “Include data source credibility, sample representativeness, market trend validation, e strategic application framework.”
Esempio di utilizzo
Input: “Analizza questo competitor research report per strategic planning”
Analysis Output (estratto):
# ANALISI DOCUMENTO: TechCorp Competitive Intelligence Report
## EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXTRACTION
**MAIN PURPOSE**: Comprehensive analysis of SaaS project management market landscape with focus on emerging threats and opportunities for 2025 strategic planning.
**KEY FINDINGS**:
1. Market consolidation accelerating (15 acquisitions in 18 months)
2. AI-powered features becoming table stakes (80% of competitors launching AI within 12 months)
3. Enterprise segment showing 40% growth vs 12% SMB
4. New pricing models emerging (usage-based vs seat-based)
5. Integration ecosystem becoming key differentiator
**CRITICAL DECISIONS**: Report recommends aggressive AI investment and enterprise pivot within 6 months to maintain competitive position.
**STAKEHOLDER IMPACT**:
- Product: Major feature roadmap adjustment needed
- Sales: Enterprise team scaling required
- Marketing: Repositioning campaign necessary
- Engineering: AI capabilities development priority
## ACTIONABLE INSIGHTS
**OPPORTUNITIES**:
- Enterprise market growth momentum (40% YoY) - we should double down
- AI adoption still early (competitive timing window open)
- Integration partnerships underexploited by competitors
**RISKS**:
- Current feature set becoming commoditized rapidly
- SMB market contraction may impact 60% of revenue base
- Venture-backed competitors raising capital for price wars
**CRITICAL QUESTIONS**:
1. Do we have AI development capability to match competitive timeline?
2. Can sales team handle enterprise complexity transition?
3. What's our war chest for potential price competition?
**RECOMMENDATIONS**:
1. **IMMEDIATE**: Audit AI capabilities gap vs competitors (2 weeks)
2. **SHORT-term**: Launch enterprise pilot program (Q1)
3. **MEDIUM-term**: Develop AI-first feature roadmap (Q1-Q2)
4. **STRATEGIC**: Consider acquisition vs build analysis for AI capabilities
Tips per risultati migliori
- Document quality: Ensure document è complete e readable per accurate analysis
- Context specificity: Più preciso sei su purpose/decision context, più relevant sarà l’analysis
- Structured approach: Follow template methodology per comprehensive coverage
- Verification habit: Cross-check critical claims con additional sources quando possibile
Template correlati
- prmpt.onl/007 - Bigino Rapido per quick document summarization
- prmpt.onl/204 - Competitive Intelligence per strategic document analysis
- prmpt.onl/101 - Chain of Thought per complex reasoning validation
📖 Da “Prompt Engineering: Il Nuovo Skill” di Marco Milani
🔗 Tutti i template: prmpt.onl/index
📱 Accesso rapido: [QR Code]
Ultimo aggiornamento: 24 Gennaio 2025